“What were you thinking?”
She shrugged.
“I did it for us.”
That sentence gave me all the answers I needed.
I walked past them without saying another word.
No shouting.
No argument.
No scene.
I went straight to my car and sat behind the wheel.
For several seconds, I simply stared at my reflection.
Then I picked up my phone and called Daniel.
He answered immediately.
“You have exactly five minutes.”
“What?”
“Bring Vanessa to my attorney’s office immediately.”
He gave a nervous laugh.
“Emily, don’t be dramatic.”
I cut him off.
“No. This is your last opportunity to make things right.”
Silence followed.
Daniel still did not understand.
He thought this was about jealousy.
He thought I only wanted an apology.
Most of all, he believed I would eventually calm down and come home like I always had.
He was wrong.
He hung up.
At that exact moment, another message appeared on my phone.
It was from my attorney.
“The emergency injunction has been approved. We’re ready whenever you are.”
I read it twice.
Then I looked toward Daniel’s office building.
Five minutes had almost passed.
And Daniel still had no idea what was about to change.
Part 2
The truth was, my call to Daniel had almost nothing to do with revenge.
It was about accountability.
Six months before the incident, I had quietly purchased a minority stake in Daniel’s company using inheritance money from my late father.
The investment had been properly documented, and under the shareholder agreement, I had the legal right to inspect certain corporate records and attend shareholder meetings.
Daniel knew I owned shares.
He simply never believed I would become actively involved.
After the assault, my attorney, Rebecca Lawson, advised me to report everything immediately.
Police documented my injuries, photographed my shaved head, collected surveillance footage from the office hallway, and interviewed employees who had heard me screaming inside the restroom.
Vanessa was arrested later that evening on charges related to the assault.
Meanwhile, Rebecca focused on another issue.
“Daniel may not have committed the assault,” she explained, “but there may be serious corporate governance concerns if company resources were being misused.”